Custom Search

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

the bachelor finale 2010

he Dancing With the Stars 2010 lineup is now ready to go. However, hearing the upcoming Dancing With the Stars
lineup meant sitting through the Bachelor finale and specials first. For some, that probably wasn't a problem, but for others, it was a long wait. Yet they finally got their new list of would be dancers in the end, and it will keep them talking up until the late March premiere. As expected, the Dancing With the Stars 2010 lineup has quite a mix of unusual, headline grabbing stars.

Every season, there are C-list celebrities, athletes, entertainers, musicians, comedians, and plain old wild cards to raise eyebrows. When the show returns on March 22, it will certainly be no different. Fans sat through the Bachelor Jake/Vienna drama for three hours to find that out, but they'll be discussing this mix for three whole weeks.

Some big names in the Dancing With the Stars 2010 lineup were already leaked before last night. One of those was Kate Gosselin, who gets to bring her tabloid entourage to a network show. Pamela Anderson was also rumored as a contestant for some time, and those rumors were officially confirmed.

For the athletes, Chad Ochocinco will take his touchdown celebration dances to a new stage, while the Olympic demographic was filled by figure skating gold medalist Evan Lysacek. Athletes are traditional favorites on the show, and Ochocinco and Lysacek are sure to show flamboyance on the dance floor.

In addition, the Dancing With the Stars 2010 lineup was also filled with cross promotions for the ABC TV empire. ESPN's Erin Andrews got in, and so did the Bachelor himself, Jake Pavelka - which might explain why they announced the cast on the Bachelor finale. ABC soap star Aiden Turner was also selected.

But this year's most bizarre pick for the Dancing With the Stars lineup may be Buzz Aldrin. The second man to walk on the moon now gets to do much more than walk at 80 years old. Like Tom DeLay last season, Aldrin's selection may be more about shock value.

No comments:

Post a Comment